Godaddy Unauthorized Charges, via Paypal?


Incident Report: Unauthorized Charge by GoDaddy and Subsequent Customer Service Interaction – FAO Aman Bhutan, Brian Sharples, Mark McCaffrey & Demetria Elmore

Date of Incident: March 7, 2024


A customer experienced an unauthorized charge of $199.98 to their PayPal account, attributed to a transaction with, LLC. This charge was for two SSL certificates at $99 each. The customer vehemently claimed that the order was not placed by them, asserting that their domains and SSL certificates are managed elsewhere.

Details of Interaction:

  • The customer contacted GoDaddy support, insisting that they did not authorize the charge and demanding its cancellation and refund.
  • GoDaddy’s initial response was to request the customer’s account details for verification purposes. Despite the customer’s frustration and clarification that the charge appeared on their PayPal account and not within their GoDaddy account, GoDaddy persisted in requesting account validation.
  • The interaction escalated as the customer expressed increasing frustration through profane and abusive language, while GoDaddy’s representative attempted to navigate the situation by insisting on standard verification procedures.
  • GoDaddy identified a potential misunderstanding, suggesting the customer might have a second GoDaddy account. However, the customer denied this and continued to assert that the fraudulent charge was made to their PayPal, not to any GoDaddy account.
  • The customer provided transaction details, including an invoice ID and a transaction ID, to substantiate their claim.
  • Despite attempts to resolve the issue through account and transaction verification, communication broke down due to the customer’s escalating frustration and GoDaddy’s insistence on procedural steps the customer felt were irrelevant to their case.


The report does not conclude with a resolution. The customer was adamant about not providing additional personal or financial information to GoDaddy, citing a lack of trust due to the perceived mishandling of their case. The customer expressed intentions to escalate the matter through PayPal and potentially through public channels.

Observations and Recommendations:

  • Customer Service Approach: The interaction highlights the importance of customer service representatives being able to quickly adapt their approach in cases of high tension and potential fraud. Insisting on procedural steps, while necessary for security, can exacerbate customer frustration if not handled sensitively.
  • Fraud Detection and Account Security: This incident underscores the need for robust mechanisms to identify and rectify unauthorized transactions promptly. Ensuring that customer accounts are secure against unauthorized access and use is paramount.
  • Communication Skills: The ability to de-escalate tense situations is crucial for customer service representatives. This includes recognizing when to deviate from standard procedures to address the customer’s concerns more directly.
  • Feedback Loop: Implementing a feedback loop where customers can report suspected fraud directly to a specialized team might streamline resolution in similar cases.

Even though the customer NEVER provided his credit card to Godaddy – and only his Paypal account got scammed, Godaddy INSISTED that they will only proceed if he provides his credit card details to them. This is a stretch too far if one considers that someone has JUST been scammed, how would they trust people over a chat to provide a card which was never used in the first place? The client insisted that his PAYPAL account got scammed and provided relevant details – but Godaddy found an excuse not to progress the matter.


This incident report details a complex interaction where a customer faced an unauthorized charge from GoDaddy, leading to a highly charged and unresolved customer service experience. It suggests areas for improvement in customer service, fraud prevention, and communication strategies to better handle similar situations in the future.

The incident involving an unauthorized charge from GoDaddy and the subsequent interaction underscores a broader issue with dispute resolution involving PayPal and GoDaddy, particularly when it comes to fraudulent or incorrect charges. The situation is further complicated by the fact that both companies share common shareholders, which can lead to a perception of bias in how disputes are handled.

This perceived conflict of interest may result in PayPal being quicker to decline disputes involving GoDaddy, making it increasingly challenging for customers to seek redress and resolution. Such dynamics underline the importance of vigilance and caution for customers navigating transactions with entities that may have intertwined interests. This case exemplifies the potential difficulties customers face in achieving fair outcomes, emphasizing why some may wish to avoid engaging with this potentially toxic combination of service providers.